Home / TECHNOLOGY / Cars Technica / Why experts trust cheaper, better lidar is right around the corner

Why experts trust cheaper, better lidar is right around the corner

On Nov 3, 2007, 6 vehicles done story by successfully navigating a unnatural civic environment—and complying with California traffic laws—without a motorist behind the wheel. Five of the 6 were sporting a insubordinate new form of lidar sensor that had recently been introduced by an audio apparatus builder called Velodyne.

A decade later, Velodyne’s lidar continues to be a essential record for self-driving cars. Lidar costs are coming down but are still sincerely expensive. Velodyne and a swarm of startups are trying to change that.

In this article, we’ll take a low dive into lidar technology. We’ll explain how the record works and the hurdles technologists face as they try to build lidar sensors that meet the demanding mandate for blurb self-driving cars.

Some experts trust the pivotal to building lidar that costs hundreds of dollars instead of thousands is to desert Velodyne’s automatic design—where a laser physically spins around 360 degrees, several times per second—in preference of a solid-state pattern that has few if any moving parts. That could make the units simpler, cheaper, and much easier to mass-produce.


Nobody knows how prolonged it will take to build cost-effective automotive-grade lidar. But all of the experts we talked to were optimistic. They forked to the many prior generations of technology—from handheld calculators to antilock brakes—that became radically cheaper as they were made at scale. Lidar appears to be on a identical trajectory, suggesting that in the prolonged run, lidar costs won’t be a separator to mainstream adoption of self-driving cars.

An doubtful lidar pioneer

Velodyne's 64-channel lidar was a breakthrough for driverless cars.

Scientists have been using laser light to magnitude distances given the 1960s, when a group from MIT precisely totalled the stretch to the moon by bouncing laser light off of it. But the story of lidar for self-driving cars starts with businessman and contriver David Hall.

In the early 2000s, Hall was the founder and CEO of Velodyne, a successful audio apparatus maker. Hall was also a robotics enthusiast.

“We were appearing on BattleBots and Robot Wars around that time, which was mostly an forgive for promotion the Velodyne loudspeaker,” Hall told Wired in a new interview.

So when DARPA, the military investigate group that birthed the Internet, announced a robot automobile race called the Grand Challenge, Hall motionless to enter. For the 2004 competition, Hall and his hermit built a robot lorry guided by a span of cameras. That proceed didn’t work good adequate to finish the race—but conjunction did anyone else’s robot.

For the second DARPA race in 2005, the Hall brothers deserted cameras and focused on lidar instead. Other teams were also using lidar, but lidar sensors on the marketplace were primitive. A renouned lidar at the time was the SICK LMS-291. This was a two-dimensional lidar system, definition it could only indicate a singular plane cut of the world.

That helped cars detect objects like walls and tree trunks that went true up from the ground. But it could get teams in difficulty if they encountered obstacles—like tyrannise channel arms—with some-more strange shapes. And it was invalid if cars wanted to actually commend objects—like specifying a walking from a street sign, for example—rather than just equivocate obstacles.

The three-dimensional indicate cloud prisoner by a Velodyne 64-laser lidar (left) is distant richer than the indicate clouds prisoner by two-dimensional lidars like the SICK 200-series (right).

So the Hall brothers grown a new form of lidar. They mounted a smoke-stack of 64 lasers onto a rotating gimbal that spun around 360 degrees. This allowed the section to collect a truly three-dimensional perspective of the universe around the vehicle.

The Hall brothers didn’t win the 2005 race, but their higher lidar sensor captivated seductiveness from other teams. By the time of DARPA’s third and final DARPA race in 2007, Velodyne had begun production lidar units and selling them. Hall didn’t enter the 2007 race, but many of the top teams—including 5 out of 6 of the contingent winners—were sporting Velodyne lidar.

auto magazine

Check Also

Uber self-driving automobile crashes into another automobile in Pittsburgh

reader comments 236 An Uber self-driving automobile collided with another automobile in Pittsburgh on Feb …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>