Photo Credit: screen grab
In the arise of the Las Vegas sharpened progressing this month, which killed 59 people and left some-more than 500 injured, televangelist Pat Robertson blamed the electrocute on Americans’ disregard for Donald Trump.
Robertson said, “Why is it happening? You know, what I’d like to give you is the fact that we have disregard for authority. There is surpassing disregard of the boss all opposite this nation.”
Robertson done his comments on his TV show The 700 Club, which front twice a day on ABC’s Freeform Network. The network, before famous as ABC Family, is partial of Disney Television Group/ABC and unconditionally owned by the Walt Disney Company.
Disney CEO Robert Iger has also been outspoken after the Las Vegas shooting. Three Disney employees were killed in the massacre. Iger, speaking out about gun assault at the Vanity Fair New Establishment Summit, said, “In this day and age we get angry when an contestant doesn’t mount for the inhabitant anthem. Where is the outrage here?”
But are Disney and Iger angry by Robertson’s comments? They should be.
Michael Gordon, expertise executive of the Center for Social Impact, Ross School of Business at the University of Michigan, said, “The kind of assault that Robertson detests is speedy by the president, from his exaggerate that he could fire someone in extended illumination and no one would care, to sympathizing with bigots in Charlottesville.”
Disney’s overpower about Robertson’s remarks confers the company’s taciturn approval.
Gordon said, “Condoning Robertson’s viewpoint carries risks for Disney.”
Why would Disney select to sojourn wordless about Robertson’s inflammatory comments, aired on its ABC network?
Disney is handcuffed to Robertson and his Christian Broadcast Network, which produces The 700 Club;bound by contractual agreement. According to TV Insider: “When Disney/ABC bought Fox Family Channel for $5.3 billion in 2001, it too was saddled with that agreement. The understanding says The 700 Clubcan’t be buried in the center of the night, but must air during certain dayparts.”
But Disney’s agreement to promote Robertson’s show does not free the company from its dignified shortcoming to forgo his remarks.
Edward Queen is executive of the Program in Ethics and Servant Leadership at Emory University’s Center for Ethics. He also serves as executive of investigate for the Institute of Human Rights and co-convener of the Initiative on Religion, Conflict, and Peacebuilding.
Queen pronounced we can “question either Disney is putting their corporate interests forward of their dignified shortcoming to reject Robertson’s inflammatory remarks.”
Disney can’t disremember Robertson’s comments by dismissing him as a border dweller. Robertson interviewed President Trump in July. Earlier this month, Los Angeles Dodgers star pitcher Klayton Kershaw seemed on The 700 Club. CBN’s reported revenues are some-more than $307 million a year (tax-exempt).
In his remarks, Robertson cited the need for “biblical authority.” What about his confluence to beliefs of Christianity?
Queen said, “It’s a totally absurd explain that the Divine would confirm to retaliate a country with the vulgar massacre of a organisation of innocents — it’s the top form of blasphemy. It’s even some-more absurd to censure this on the disregard of authority. Robertson is zero some-more than an hostess and a politician who wraps himself up in the pages of the Bible, and he needs to be called out as such.”
What is Disney’s joining to dignified responsibility? Disney’s matter on “Corporate Citizenship” says:
“Acting responsibly is an constituent partial of the company. At Disney, we impute to the extended efforts to control the business and create the products in an reliable demeanour as Disney citizenship.”
Is Disney behaving responsibly by providing Robertson with a platform, while remaining wordless about his inflammatory remarks?
Gordon said, “Like any organisation that wants to be a good corporate citizen, Disney must attend to its supply chain,” referring to Robertson’s “poisonous words.”
Are investors endangered about reputational repairs caused by Robertson’s comments, tainting the Disney and ABC brands — the company’s many profitable assets?
Shareholder romantic James McRitchie binds Disney in his portfolio. He said, “Disney would do good to make a transparent matter that Pat Robertson’s views do not represent those of Disney,” adding, “Iger could make a matter that leaves no doubt about where Disney stands on the issues and could even forgo Robertson’s remarks.”
The Parnassus Core Equity Fund binds 5,415,101 shares of Disney batch (reported 8/31/17). At today’s share price, the fund binds some-more than a half-billion dollars in value. Parnassus’ goal states: “Every investment we make must meet severe elemental and environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria.”
How does Disney’s overpower about Robertson’s comments align with Parnassus’ and other ESG fund managers screening criteria? A orator from Parnassus declined to comment.
McRitchie said, “Disney is seen by many as the summary of American values. They should be station for the American dream, not the American nightmare. Columbine, Newtown, Las Vegas. At some indicate Disney will need to use whatever dignified management they have to quell this flourishing epidemic.”
No one from Disney has responded to inquiries.
Queen said, ”If Disney fails to come out visibly on Robertson’s comments, they open themselves to critique of pomposity at best, and dignified timidity at worst.”
Where is Disney’s outrage?
Nancy Levine is Author of The Tao of Pug book series (Penguin/Skyhorse). She completed California state acceptance training as an disciple for victims of domestic violence.