Home / Health / U.S. Tobacco Must Issue “Corrective Statements” – When Will The Courts Demand The Same For Vaccine Makers “Tobacco Science”?

U.S. Tobacco Must Issue “Corrective Statements” – When Will The Courts Demand The Same For Vaccine Makers “Tobacco Science”?

By Catherine J. Frompovich

According to a sovereign justice order, Altria, R. J. Reynolds Tobacco, Lorillard and Philip Morris USA were systematic to compensate for and run biography and media advertisements stating:

“More people,” one ad says, “die every year from smoking than murder, AIDS, suicide, drugs, automobile crashes, and alcohol, combined.” Another reads: “Cigarette companies intentionally designed cigarettes with adequate nicotine to create and means addiction.” [2]

But let’s be honest: Tobacco ‘scientists’ were means to convince and acculturate consumers to get bending on and dependant to a famous health-harming product and ensuing health-damaging robe and addiction.

1

Tobacco scholarship revisited: Tobacco kills! “Deceiving the open for decades.”

https://youtu.be/O8I39Yb2a_I?

Tobacco companies designed products to make them some-more addictive! [1]

Recall how big tobacco knowingly and deliberately cheated and assured consumers using tobacco products as something medical doctors practiced—so ‘safety’ was implied—and docs even had elite brands!

In 1946, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company ran the following ad:

Source

But R.J. Reynolds was not alone in the “conspiracy of deceit” per what’s turn famous as a classical irreverent for fake science, “tobacco science.”

In the 1930s, Lucky Strike ran an ad stating that “20,679 Physicians contend ‘Luckies are reduction irritating;’ ‘it’s toasted’!” [3]

A 1949 ad had a dentist saying, “As your Dentist, we would suggest Viceroys.” “Viceroys filter the smoke!” [4]

A cigarette branded as Murad, The Turkish Cigarette went so distant as to show Santa Claus sitting on a snow-covered roof with his back against the funnel and this content prompting, “What could you Enjoy some-more this Christmas than Murad.” [5]

There were hundreds, if not thousands of advertisements, which spewed antagonistic fraud-filled lies about ‘tobacco science’ not inspiring health adversely. Even to this very day, there are those scientists who, for a consulting fee, still promote ‘tobacco science’ for other industries. Those identical ‘scientists’ can be found testifying per the ‘safety’ and/or ‘efficacies’ of vaccines, AMI Smart Meters, dungeon phones, Wi-Fi, 5G, and other products, which the tobacco attention apparently taught product manufacturers how to sell with impunity, i.e., use presumably convincing ‘experts’ e.g., medical doctors, lawyers and PhD ‘experts’ who don’t follow rising scholarship but, for their high-end fees, will promote attention associations and veteran societies mantras about the ‘proven safety’ of products or services regardless of the fact no short- or long-term health reserve and/or environmental impact studies have been done. Those ‘experts’ customary refrains always are, “more studies need to be done.”

More studies never are enough, and never will be enough, for those compelling vested seductiveness agendas like the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, the Federal Communications Commission and all the alphabet agencies which have turn corporate lackeys.

What happened?

However, one has to doubt what happened that “turned the tide” against big tobacco. Who did what to whom; or who didn’t compensate off whom adequate hush money; or what was it that finished the 1964 “Surgeon General’s Reports on Smoking and Tobacco Use” [6] released by Luther L. Terry, MD, turn a reality and taken seriously?

Readers will note that report is posted on the CDC’s website.

What’s happened given 1964 to make sovereign alphabet agencies one-sided, or even biased toward and adamant, about usurpation only manufacturer-produced ‘tobacco science’ for vaccines, pharmaceuticals, genetically mutated ‘phoods’, pesticides/herbicides, poisonous chemicals, etc.?

The “culture” changed within sovereign agencies and Congress, generally given companies have been flexing their financial bravery and even threats, as did vaccine manufacturers with the U.S. Congress in 1986 that resulted in the vast vaccine law, The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 (42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34), which needs to be repealed immediately, if not sooner! Why? Because vaccine scholarship is worse than tobacco science!

The explanation you need.

* In Jun 2000: The barbarous Simpsonwood Conference when 52 big wigs from CDC, FDA, WHO and comparison Big Pharma executives got together to conference about how to skip the fact that CDC epidemiologist Verstraeten had found vaccines Thimerosal (ethylmercury) had autism causations. Here is that 48 page twin of the assembly notes. One alloy attending Simpsonwood, Dr. Caserta, said:

One of the things we schooled at the Aluminum Conference in Puerto Rico that was tied into the steel lines in biology and medicine that we never really accepted before, is the interactive outcome of opposite ions and opposite metals when they are together in the same organism. It is not the same as when they are alone, and we consider it would be ridiculous for us not to embody aluminum as partial of the meditative with this.

What Dr. Caserta was referring to was the inclusion of ethylmercury (Thimerosal) and any of 4 opposite aluminum adjuvants that can be used together in several vaccines! It still goes on.

* Poul Thorsen, MD, PhD, fake vaccine researcher and indicted for CDC income misappropriation “Vaccine Data Manipulator Extraordinaire” as we wrote about in Sep 2017 per “22 sovereign rapist depends – 13 depends of handle rascal and 9 depends of income laundering,” and still the CDC promotes Thorsen’s autism studies as current research. Those studies should be retracted and pulled from the medical literature, as the CDC/FDA are ‘enablers’ of counsel vaccine misinformation granted by Thorsen.

* CDC whistleblower William Thompson, PhD, CDC epidemiologist, who is on accessible fasten phone conversations stating he and other CDC scientists conspired to bar impending information per the MMR vaccine causing autism in immature black boys under 3 years of age.

All scientists operative on that plan met in one specific room to drop the MMR vaccine-autism couple information by dispatch it into a outrageous rabble can they brought into the room for that purpose. FRAUD, if there ever was fraud, committed at the CDC!

Dr. Thompson’s whistleblowing is documented in the film VAXXED: From Cover-up to Catastrophe.

CDC actually knew vaccines were causing autism, but covered it up and still do to this very day!

Representative Bill Posey of Florida called for a special vaccine/Whistleblower Thompson review by the U.S. Congress. None has taken place given Jul of 2015 when Rep. Posey finished his defence before Congress.

* Merck Company’s fake investigate information on the Mumps active efficiency in its MMR vaccine. Two former Merck employees—now whistleblowers—have a qui tam law fit in Philadelphia, PA sovereign justice wherein they contend Merck fudged the Mumps efficiency rating for 10 years, thereby permitting Merck to say a virtual ‘monopoly’ on its MMR vaccine. What kind of rascal did Merck commit? They combined antibodies from rabbit blood to boost the efficiency to 100%.

* The Hannah Poling Autism Case
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/vaccine-injury-case-offer/

This autism case was staid by the vaccine justice given of Hannah’s mitochondrial DNA involvement, which should prove the prerequisite to charge that every child before ever receiving his/her very first vaccine should be tested to find out if he/she has the same mitochondrial inclination that was concerned in the Hannah Poling case, or otherwise.

The PCR (polymerase sequence reaction) test can detect such anomalies, but the CDC will not concede that test to be performed! Shouldn’t Congress be demanding that test be finished to save U.S. children from vaccine damage?

“83 Cases of Autism Associated with Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensated in Federal Vaccine Court”

* The U.S. Supreme Court [Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC, 2011 (7) ] certified vaccines are unavoidably unsafe! “In other words, the Vaccine Act released pattern defects by intent. At slightest that’s how SCOTUS interpreted it. If pattern defects are to be an exception, Congress will have to rectify the law or pass a new law.[8] [CJF emphasis]

How can consumers accept and trust sovereign agencies ‘science’ and mandates, when zero is finished to scold the fraud?

Survival Solar Battery Charger – Free Today!

With the above support and overacting per what clearly smacks of rascal and vested corporate interests distant and above the health and contentment of U.S. children, who are being forced under chastisement of state laws (California’s SB277!), including relatives incarcerations for refusal to immunize with poisonous vaccines, every person who values healthy children must be asking when will the courts do the same to vaccine makers about their fake scholarship and charge “corrective statements” be published in every medical journal, every newspaper, every magazine, and on every radio station, radio and wire networks?

What you can do.

Shouldn’t you be requesting your members of Congress to:

  • repeal the NCVIA of 1986;
  • mandate PCR contrast to discern mitochondrial proclivities before any vaccinations begin; and
  • pass a Resolution requiring vaccine makers must tell “corrective statements” about the tobacco scholarship they have been compelling for decades about vaccines, identical to what the tobacco attention has had to do to scold its fake statements?

References:

[1] http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-11-26/big-tobacco-forced-to-advertise-admissions-in-us/9194960
[2] https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/24/business/media/tobacco-companies-ads.html
[3] https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/outrageous-vintage-cigarette-ads/4/ Slide No. 4
[4] Ibid. Slide No. 6
[5] Ibid. Slide No. 10
[6] https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/index.htm
[7] https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/562/223/
[8] https://respectfulinsolence.com/2011/02/23/the-supreme-court-rules-on-bruesewitz-v/

Resources:

The Scientific Basis Of Tobacco Product Regulation / World Health Organization 2008 (Second Report)
http://www.who.int/tobacco/global_interaction/tobreg/publications/9789241209519.pdf

Exposing the FDA’s Vaccine Injury Cover-up: An Interview With Walter Kyle, Esq.
https://www.activistpost.com/2012/08/exposing-fdas-vaccine-injury-cover-up.html

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired healthy nutritionist who warranted modernized degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice and Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in inhabitant and airline magazines given the early 1980s. Catherine authored countless books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic medical professionals. She has been a consumer medical researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published Oct 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, accessible on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective Non-Toxic Treatments, is accessible on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s some-more new books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can we Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available



auto magazine

Check Also

Does The Push For Mass Vaccination Point Toward A Staged Bioterror Event?

December 4, 2017 By Jon Rappoport We’ve seen the signs. I’ve been highlighting them. The …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>