Home / News / This Former NFL Player Is Running on a Progressive Agenda to Flip a Red District in Texas

This Former NFL Player Is Running on a Progressive Agenda to Flip a Red District in Texas

Photo Credit: Screenshot / YouTube

When it comes to Texas, for many years inhabitant domestic pundits have focused on one question: When will the state spin blue? This year, a series of Democrats are using in the Lonestar State, from Beto O’Rourke, who is severe Ted Cruz for a U.S. Senate seat, to several possibilities opposed for House seats deliberate newly up for grabs.

Among them is Colin Allred, a polite rights profession and former Tennessee Titans linebacker who has thrown his shawl into the ring for the 32nd Congressional District. Like many other districts in the state, the 32nd, containing tools of Dallas and its suburbs and exurbs, was so aggressively gerrymandered that Allred’s staffers fun it looks like a dog, despite a reduction accessible one than his office’s proprietor Rhodesian Ridgeback, Scarlett. The 32nd has been represented by Republican Pete Sessions given it was combined in 2003 as a protected Republican seat. That reserve was called into doubt in 2016, when citizens in the district chose Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump by one point.

While Sessions has continued to opinion in lock-step with Trump, it didn’t take prolonged after the presidential opinion for Democrats to see his chair as contestable ground. Allred is using in a swarming primary field, where 7 Democratic challengers have announced so far. But the biggest separator to him or any other Democrat claiming the chair may be Texas’s draconian voting laws that have led to low turnout: the state ranks 49th in the republic for voter participation.


Allred considers himself the many on-going claimant in the race, and is using on a height of Medicare for all, a $15 smallest wage, campaign financial remodel and involuntary voter registration.

As a polite rights attorney, Allred has spent much of his career outward the NFL fortifying against attacks on voting rights at the internal and inhabitant level. As he tells me, “Texas isn’t a red state. Texas is a non-voting state.” By this he means that white and middle-class Republicans have an easier time branch out on election day than Texas’s flourishing race of people of color. And while the state’s voter ID laws are notoriously stringent—allowing Texans to use secluded lift licenses but not tyro IDs to vote—its voter registration policies may good keep even some-more people from getting to the polls, quite citizens of color.

The state does not concede same-day registration, and anyone anticipating to register citizens has to first take a category and spin “deputized” to do so, a acceptance that only relates to the county where the acceptance is granted. For primaries like Allred’s—races where turn-out is already likely to be low—the complement presents an generally tough hurdle. Registration for voting in the Mar 6 race is already closed.  

In many ways, the 32nd is a microcosm for the kind of districts Democrats may have to learn to win if they wish to retake control of Congress: A different district where Republicans have erected innumerable roadblocks to mobilizing what could be the core of a on-going base.

On Super Bowl Sunday at his campaign bureau in Richardson, Texas, just north of Dallas, we spoke with Allred about the district he hopes to represent, his career as a polite rights attorney, the increasingly charged secular politics of the NFL and how to spin Texas blue.

Kate Aronoff: How did you confirm to run?

Colin Allred: I didn’t consider we would run for office, positively not at this theatre in my life. we wanted to give back to my community, and that’s since we went to law school and became a polite rights attorney. we wanted to be concerned in the things that had given me a possibility and allowed me to follow my chronicle of the American Dream. And we saw we were—in a lot of ways—slipping back on polite rights.

For a while, those of us in the polite rights village have felt like we were losing belligerent and fortifying timorous belligerent instead of pulling forward. The election of Donald Trump was the ultimate conflict of the illness that had been discouraging us.

Here in my community, where we was innate and raised, we have a member of Congress who we have famous for decades and who is totally out of step with the village that we are. Whatever North Texas is, it’s not what Pete Sessions is. I’ve been wanting to get absolved of him for a prolonged time, so we motionless to run against him.

KA: Can you give some context for the district?

CA: This district takes partial of Dallas and combines it with some of the suburbs and exurbs, as many of the Dallas districts do. That’s how Republicans try to keep those districts Republican, given the city correct is very blue. But they’ve been undermined by some of the fast changes in the area. It’s a very different district, and there are 100,000 people a year moving to North Texas.

It’s a district that has two tails to it: There are some very abounding areas, and there are some folks who’re really struggling. In a lot of ways, it mirrors the country.

KA: Yours is a swarming primary. What would you contend are the big differences between you and other Democrats running?

CA: I’m the many on-going candidate, but we also have the many grassroots-driven campaign. We have hundreds of volunteers and we’ve knocked on 13,000 doors, which is a lot for a congressional primary this distant out in Texas. And that’s how we consider we have to kick Pete Sessions. we don’t consider you’re going to kick long-term obligatory Republicans opposite the country by using general Democrats on general Democratic platforms. We have to have possibilities who have a story to tell and who can interest to citizens who don’t always come out to vote.

KA: How do you consider the Democratic Party needs to change to retake Congress?

CA: We need to equivocate the ambuscade of just hostile Trump. we am troubled by Donald Trump as a human being and as the boss of the United States. But we have to know what citizens are for instead of just what they’re against.

A check that was finished after the election pronounced that a vast commission of citizens consider the Democratic Party stands for the rich. That is a big problem. Obviously the policies don’t. But there’s positively something we’ve finished as a party that has led to that perception, and we have to residence that.

Our caring has not been confidant adequate on what we’re station for. For example, the new opinion in the Senate to keep the supervision open with a stability resolution. we consider that was a outrageous mistake. They should have stood organisation and gotten a purify DREAM Act. We’re not traffic with an honest profession on the other side. And this is the thing we were inaugurated to do—to mount up for things like this. If you don’t, then since should we re-elect you? If you’re wondering where the Black opinion is or where the Latino opinion is, it’s issues like this. When you’ve invested in a claimant or a party and you don’t feel like they show up for you. That’s when people spin off.

KA: What should that forward-facing call be in the 32nd District?

CA: Number one is healthcare. We have a medical predicament in North Texas. One in 5 people in Dallas County don’t have health insurance. One in 6 Texans don’t have health insurance—the tip uninsured rate in the nation. You can’t follow your dreams if you can’t go see a doctor. That’s since we trust so strongly in concept healthcare, and have oral about my support for a Medicare for All complement that can yield a baseline of coverage.

The second thing is open education. In Texas, we have not invested adequate in open education, period. And we are always fighting back on the forces that are trying to do what they call “school choice,” which is really just siphoning off appropriation from open schools for vouchers to send kids to private schools and prejudiced schools. I’m a product of Dallas open schools. we come from a prolonged line of educators. We have to deposit so much some-more in the open education.

The other thing is good profitable jobs and salary growth. Our capability has grown tremendously given the 1970s, but the normal American worker hasn’t gotten a raise. People know that they’re operative harder for less, even if they don’t have the vernacular for it. So many of the gains that we’ve finished from the common tough work have left to the top. That’s not the American way. It’s not radical or revolutionary to contend that’s not the way we do things.

Our inequality problem is just exploding, and it’s a outrageous problem. Even if you don’t caring about the dignified side—which we do—you should caring about the issue from the small-d approved side. When people feel like there’s no possibility for them it drives down appearance and leads to nonconformist politicians like Donald Trump.

KA: What are some of the trends you’ve seen in Texas in your work as a polite rights profession operative on voting rights?

CA: Texas is one of the misfortune states in terms of voter suppression. The state supervision here upheld a voter ID law that was the strictest in the country, and combined some-more restrictions to voter registration. Republicans can review demographics as good as anyone, and they’ve finished all they can to safeguard that voting is not the range of people of tone in this area. There’s no other way to contend it.

Putting clamps on voter registration is the easiest way to stop people from voting. A lot of people speak about voter ID laws given it’s the many apparent thing, but the genuine attribution thing is restrictions on registration. That’s how you really stop people from getting involved. You can find ways around voter ID laws, but if you’re not registered, we can’t do anything for you. That’s the biggest fight here in Texas and the biggest fight opposite the country, and that’s since I’m going to be pulling for involuntary voter registration in Congress. We can do this as a country, we’ve just selected not to.

It’s a long-running battle. Whether you caring about the economy or the sourroundings or the smallest wage, whatever the issue is, it comes down to getting adequate people out to opinion to change it. Our policies have infancy support. We just don’t have adequate people voting.

KA: How have you dealt with these barriers in the campaign?

CA: We try to speak about it in ways that it doesn’t sound too daunting, but it is the biggest jump we face. If we had 75 percent turn-out in this district then we would simply kick Pete Sessions. We’re going to have to enhance who’s voting. My credentials and my story can help bring people out who competence not come out otherwise. Because we went to the same schools they went to, they know that we was lifted by a singular mom and was means to make it to the NFL and spin a polite rights attorney—they know that we know what they’re facing. There’s an component of fad to me being a former NFL player, which helps.

KA: Not that the NFL wasn’t domestic before, but it’s been flattering conspicuous to watch Trump take aim at players who are holding a domestic stand. What has your greeting been?

CA: I’ve talked to a lot of former players about this. All of us feel that what happened this year with the boss targeting these players was a defilement of the First Amendment rights.

Football players are wakeful of the position in society, generally African-American players. We know that in some cases we’ll be the many distinguished black person that a black child will watch. We know that their eyes are on this, and we feel a constraint to take a stand. Some of the kids who you see in the NFL now are 21 and 22 years old. They’ve motionless to take a mount for something they trust in, and now they have the boss of the United States singling them out and observant they’re not patriots.

I wish that some-more players that weren’t just black would have gotten involved, given this is a inhabitant issue: Issues of police assault and trust between communities and their police is not something that is only germane for the African-American community. What’s going on in some of these communities has to be addressed, and players who took a mount felt so strongly about it that they were peaceful to remove their jobs—jobs that may be the only possibility for them to change the generational resources for their family. If they’re peaceful to risk that, you should at slightest listen to what they have to say.

KA: What do you consider it would take to spin Texas blue?

CA: Texas is not a red state. Texas is a non-voting state. Right now we’re electing officials who represent a minority of the population. There’s not going to be a china bullet. The way we pull that stone serve up the mountain is by using possibilities who interest to people who aren’t voting at as high a rate, and who in some cases come from those communities. We started to do that in 2014. Wendy Davis and Leticia Van de Putte ran and did a good job, even yet they lost by a lot. The work that was finished to purify up the voter file and bring domestic talent back to Texas. So many people volunteered for Wendy who are now volunteering on my campaign. Those ideas—people meditative they have to hit doors and make phone calls—was an visitor thing to Texas until Wendy ran. Now it’s going to be easier for any person after her, so we have to keep building on that.

Ultimately, the answer has to be that we spin out an citizens that is as different as the state is and make certain they’re means to vote. If that happens, the state will spin blue. Republicans, for whatever reason, have deserted the minority vote. As Democrats we have to gain on that and interest to the folks who feel like they don’t have a voice.

We have to remember that Hillary lost Texas by 9 points, which is about the same volume she lost Ohio and Iowa by, which are both deliberate to be pitch states. And she didn’t spend any income here, compared with the millions she spent in those states.

Our future as a party is in the South and the Southwest: states like Texas, Georgia and Alabama. Those are the states that are going to flip, given they’re so diverse. Those are the states we should be investing in.


Kate Aronoff is an organizer and freelance author whose essay has been published in Waging Nonviolence, Dissent Magazine, AlterNet, and the New York Times. Find her on Twitter at @katearonoff.

auto magazine

Check Also

Europe’s Top 5 Cities for Cocaine, Ecstasy and Speed Use

Photo Credit: Avis De Miranda / Shutterstock.com Want to know Europe’s loyal party capitals? The …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>