“Well, boys, we’ve got this weird thing called THE INDIVIDUAL. Could somebody tell me what he is? He’s not adapting to the algorithms. He’s all over the place. And while we’re at it, what the ruin is this IMAGINATION? It keeps slipping out of the grasp, it doesn’t fit the plan…”
—Technocrats contend they wish to clean out poverty, war, and inequality. But in sequence to grasp these lofty goals (or fake to), they need to re-program humans—
Technocracy is the simple bulletin and devise for statute global multitude from above, so we need to know it from several angles.
Consider a organisation of eager forward-looking engineers in the early 20th century. They work for a company that has a agreement to make a locomotive.
This is a rarely challenging piece of equipment.
On one level, workers are compulsory to make the components to spec. Then they must put them all together. These tasks are formidable.
On another level, several departments of the company must coordinate their efforts. This is also noticed as a technological job. Organizing is deliberate a technology.
When the locomotive is finished and delivered, and when it runs on its marks and pulls a train, a good and moving feat is won.
And then…the engineers start to consider about the implications. Suppose the locomotive was multitude itself? Suppose multitude was the finished product? Couldn’t multitude be put together in a concurrent fashion? And couldn’t the “technology of organizing things” be employed for the job?
Why worry with forever arguing and fibbing politicians? Why should they be in charge? Isn’t that an apparent losing proposition? Of march it is.
Engineers could lay out and build a future multitude that would advantage all people. Disease and misery could be wiped out. Eliminating them would be prejudiced of the blueprint.
This “insight” hit engineers and technicians like a ton of bricks. Of course! All societies had been failures for the same reason: the wrong people were in charge.
Armed with this new understanding, engineers of every ribbon began to see what was needed. A series in meditative about governmental organization. Science was the new king. And scholarship would rule.
Of course, for an engineered universe to work, certain decisions would have to be finished about the role of the individual. Every individual. You couldn’t have an air-tight devise if every human were free to pursue his own objectives. Too many variables. Too much confusion. Too much conflict. Well, that problem could be solved. The individual’s actions would be tailored to fit the concurrent operations of the designed society.
The particular would be “one of the components of the locomotive.” His life would be connected to other lives to furnish an model shape.
Yes, this could indicate a few problems, but those problems could be worked out. They would have to be worked out, since the major thought was the combining of a universe organization. What would you do if one bolt (an particular human) in one circle of a locomotive was the wrong size? You would go back and scold the error. You would re-make the bolt.
Other people entered the game. High-echelon Globalists saw technocracy as a complement they could use to control the population.
Essentially, an already-misguided prophesy of a future technocratic paradise was hijacked. Something bad was finished much worse.
In a nutshell, this is the story of technocracy.
A locomotive is a society? No. That was the first fatally injured idea. Everything that followed was increasingly bizarre.
Unfortunately, many people in the universe trust in Globalism, if you could call a prejudiced deceptive perspective a legitimate belief. They dreamily boyant on all the promotion cover stories—greatest good for the biggest series of people; no some-more poverty; equivalence of sharing; shortening the CO footprint; a immature economy; “sustainable development”; general cooperation; dispersal prolongation and expenditure of products and services for the lift of everyone; and all of this delivered from a executive height of charitable guidance.
If you lane down the specifics that lay under these cover stories, you learn a mangled complement of formulation that expresses control over the global population.
The common paradise turns out to be a sham.
Waking up is tough to do? Breaking up is tough to do? They must be done.
A applicable technological fix is a very good feat when the devise is a machine. But transferring that heat of feat to the whole of multitude is an illusion. Anything that calls itself preparation would tackle the apparition as the first sequence of business.
Engineering multitude requires engineering humans.
That is the deadly flaw.
It’s called mind control.
Any genuine artist, any builder of communities, any lucid activist, any honest idealist stands outward technocracy, and is not prejudiced of this program.
Instead, his bearing is toward some-more particular leisure and a some-more open multitude with larger decentralization of power.
Decentralization is the key.
The use of record does not indicate vital inside its control. The use of record does not indicate that multitude should be laid out like a hulk appurtenance with propitious parts.
Those futurists who have offering “overall plans” for the showing of multitude generally omit or avoid the issue of who is going to discharge the plan. To contend this is an blunder is a immeasurable understatement.
Where is one inclusive core of appetite in the universe that would run society?
All such centers of appetite are, first and foremost, dedicated to their own survival. And after that, they are dedicated to control of the domain they trust they own. THE INDIVIDUAL is a disorderly thing that needs to be sidelined or dealt with as a disruptive element.
I pronounce to those people who know that the thought of the free, independent, powerful, and artistic particular is being sidelined, shelved, and sent down the memory hole. This is no accident. This isn’t just a devolutionary trend. Technocrats see this as a required action, in sequence to “clean up” their equation for the civilization they’re building. The particular is a sleazy non-static that throws a gorilla wrench into formulas.
Imagination never dies.
It belongs to the individual. It isn’t skill of the group.
It enables solutions that exterminate problems and get out forward of problems before they lift their heads.
Time and time again, the individual, as he wends his way by life, encounters persons and organizations that consider imagination a negative. In the clearly tangible shapes of society, imagination must take a back chair to planning.
Is the particular resistant to such manipulations, or does he give in?
This is the pivotal question.
Does the particular perspective multitude as an operation that can potentially lift up people and commission them? Or does he give in to the thought that multitude should create some-more and some-more contingent people?
The particular can be a source of swelling freedom, or he can urge the thought that there are an unconstrained series of “entitlements” that must be honored.
Survival Solar Battery Charger – Free Today!
Technocracy promotes entitlements as a pathway into the future. Its ultimate desert goes this way: you have the right to be re-programmed to trust you have a container in the future world; we will make this container as appealing as possible; you will offer the altogether good as we operative it.
That is the elemental justification for the Welfare State. It’s the justification for a future technocratic policy which will allot adults appetite quotas. A citizen would be available to devour a set volume of appetite in a given time period. (So-called smart meters are a step in that direction. The meters capacitate some-more specific measurements of appetite consumption.)
This is how technocracy views the future…your future.
The ultimate technocratic vision? Your brain is a processor, and your brain is your mind. That’s all your mind is. Therefore, joining your brain to a super-computer, or to the Cloud, will magically enhance your mind and make it “more than human.”
You will turn trans-human. A hybrid of human and machine.
This is the angel story to finish all angel tales.
It’s sad anticipation dressed up as science.
The thought is: you will turn More. You will overcome the boundary and problems compared with being an individual.
Every particular will accept the same information and the same answers and the same solutions from the Cloud. AUTOMATICALLY.
This is the programmer’s soppy dream.
Technocrats will so be means to build a global multitude and control its every facet.
That’s the revolution.
The counter-revolution is YOU.
The free individual.
Never forget it.
The author of two bomb collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a claimant for a US Congressional chair in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an inquisitive contributor for 30 years, essay articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and artistic appetite to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails atwww.nomorefakenews.com