Home / News / The Ties That Bind Sexual Assault, Gender, and 21st-Century Capitalism

The Ties That Bind Sexual Assault, Gender, and 21st-Century Capitalism

Photo Credit: 271 EAK MOTO / Shutterstock.com

Rampant passionate abuse is finally being uncovered. It’s about time. Since this is frequency something new, given is it being outed now? To answer that question, we demeanour at 3 major forces that figure sex abuse in the United States and other complicated societies. The first two are category structures: how the entrepreneur category structure organizes the work knowledge in enterprises and how what turns out to be a feudal category structure shapes the work knowledge inside households. The third force is the complement of gender definitions, roles and family that shapes many social experiences. We find to brand and explain how capitalism, feudalism and gender correlate to overdetermine passionate attack as good as women’s rebellion against passionate assault.

Capitalism organizes many enterprises’ prolongation of products and services into two essentially unsymmetrical positions: employer and employee. The former is typically positioned exclusively to confirm what gets constructed when in any enterprise. The employer alone decides the how of prolongation (technology choice) and the where (geographic location). Finally, employers accept and discharge all surpluses and increase satisfied in and by the craving as a whole. Among the people comprising the socially widespread entrepreneur enterprises of today—corporations—employers consecrate a tiny minority (major shareholders and play of directors), while employees consecrate the immeasurable majority.

Employers’ control over prolongation means that they overcome in moulding the conditions of employees’ labor (stress, authority and control hierarchy, noise, air quality, choice of co-workers, location, speed demanded, etc.). Profits yield incentives and control provides opportunities for abuses to arise. Perhaps many importantly, employers confirm possibly and when to sinecure and fire employees. Employers so yield employees with means of expenditure indispensable to means them and serve dispossess them of such means. No homogeneous capability typically runs in the retreat instruction from employees to employers.


The ensuing coherence of employees on employers—in the prolongation routine and in its compared sell routine (hiring/firing)—has been scarcely total. Such biased coherence invites and enables abuse. The novel of capitalism over the last 3 centuries exhibits many accounts of abuse by employers including passionate abuses of the arrange now so much in the news. The former Soviet Union and likewise orderly societies transposed capitalists with bureaucrats who then also assigned positions utterly like private entrepreneur employers in what we so called state capitalism. Not surprisingly, state capitalism too saw several kinds of abuse of employees there who were likewise contingent on bureaucrats sitting atop state enterprises. Even the strongest labor unions could only ever partially revoke that dependence.   

Capitalism is not alone as a prolongation complement that fosters abuses of a subordinated decline by a winning minority. Masters abused slaves, and lords abused serfs. Moreover, elemental inequalities within prolongation systems have customarily reinforced together inequalities at other social sites such as states and households. Monarchies, for example, mostly exhibited royalties’ abuses of subjects.

The employer-employee structure of entrepreneur production, with its attendant employing and banishment of employees, exposes the aroused intensity of all marketplace exchanges. Buyers and sellers with opposite levels of coherence on the outcomes of their marketplace exchanges can take aroused advantage of those differences. Employers typically count distant reduction on their entrepreneur increase than employees count on their wages. Other examples embody the grill server wanting tips, the teacher or helper seeking career advancement, the artist essay for the big break, and the sell clerk wanting opposite work hours. They all confront tangible or intensity employers from their position as unequals, depending on those who are some-more absolute than they are.

For the constructional factors contributing to abuse, a constructional solution is needed. Exhortations to “just contend no” to abuses of all kinds have remarkably together annals of failure. Exhortations to exclude and reject aroused duty did not sufficient to finish it within labour or feudalism. The story of capitalism’s clear inability to finish its abuses suggests that the same ineffectiveness of religious, legal, or reliable warning afflicts capitalism.

A constructional solution is available. It addresses the constructional roots of abuse in entrepreneur systems of prolongation by proposing a radical democratization of craving organization. Indeed, this constructional solution relates to all category systems pitting widespread minorities against subordinated majorities: master-slave, lord-serf and employer-employee structures. That solution is a democratically run village of employees who are concurrently their own common employer: what may be called worker cooperatives or workers self-directed enterprises. A transition to an economy formed on such enterprises would reinstate comparison the slave, feudal and entrepreneur enterprises by expelling their defining category structures.

Their rejecting removes a simple constructional writer to aroused duty and relationships. No minority any longer controls the vital conditions of a majority. The coherence of all on all and the shared temperament of employer and employee within workplaces obviates biased dependencies and their aroused consequences.

No uncomplicated extermination of all abuse is argued here. An economy formed on worker coops is no concept panacea. It will have its specific problems and maybe its set of abuses. But transition to such an economy will have overcome the sets of abuses suffered by the majorities within slavery, feudalism and capitalism. That is given transition to a worker-coop-based economy is formed on the recognition that those prior systems’ unsymmetrical structures of prolongation were pivotal obstacles to be overcome.

The stream courtesy to passionate abuses can mature into a grasp of their constructional roots in a capitalism that can and should be superseded. Or that courtesy can sojourn just another moment when a system’s simple smirch are glimpsed but left unaddressed given complement change seems too tough and too much to find “realistically.” Ironically the reality is that but complement change prospects are indeed bad for an finish to the sorts of abuse we now see being exposed.

In serve to superseding capitalism, we also need to substitute the gender definitions and roles that minister to men sexually assaulting women and other men. Gender roles have a sold attribute with feudal category structures. Since early colonial times, the United States, while committed strictly to autocracy and probity for all, subordinated many women inside households where the work was orderly along the lines of a feudal category structure. The matrimony propinquity orderly the wife to perform all sorts of labor (cooking, cleaning, passionate services, medical care, etc.) not only for themselves but also for their husbands. Like Gothic European serfs who swore in church ceremonies to love, honor, and conform their feudal lords, wives swore much the same to their husbands in church rituals. Like feudal lords, American husbands upheld their wives and children in homes effectively owned by their husbands. The feudal duke governed and ruled over subordinated serfs much as husbands were “kings” in their domestic “castles.” Feudal category structures, in American households as in Gothic European feudal manors, enabled all sorts of abuses by lords and husbands, including passionate abuses. Despite all sorts of changes over the centuries, many American households still keep major tools of their prolonged story of feudal category structure.

The story of European feudalism includes all demeanour of lords’ passionate abuses of serfs. Likewise, feudal households have a prolonged story of passionate abuse of wives. Songs, stories, folk tales, novels, and poems offer reams of evidence. Although rape was a crime even in colonial times, wedding rape was not criminalized around all the United States until 2005. A married women’s sexuality belonged to her husband, not to herself.

The pervasiveness of passionate attack currently reflects the total effects of households’ feudal category structures and enterprises’ entrepreneur category structures. It also reflects the society’s structure of gender definitions, roles and relations. These can position men in the positions of feudal lords at home and entrepreneur employers at work. Women are in the subordinate positions of possibly housewife/serf or entrepreneur employee or both. The decline of men are held in between: dominant, perhaps, at home but clearly subordinate at work. The doubt for them is possibly they will fan with their wives to overturn all hierarchical category structures, at home and at work, or with the widespread men in entrepreneur enterprises. In the latter case, they may good concentration on apropos widespread at slightest at home given they can't ascend—other than in fantasies—to employer positions within the entrepreneur system.

In entrepreneur America, men like Donald Trump, who swing the energy to make a beauty contestant’s career or a career in business, can use that energy to entrance subordinates’ sexuality. The workplace then replicates the feudally orderly domicile where the husband who upheld his wife economically felt entitled to take control of her sexuality. Such control is followed and used widely from the top of the entrepreneur mercantile complement to the bottom. Something some-more occurs than the descent of women’s over-abundance labor, the value their labor adds reduction than the value paid to them in wages.

Whether women employees are waitresses, plantation workers, maids, actresses, tech partners, open line workers, or youth faculty, entrance to their over-abundance product is accompanied mostly by a clarity of entitled passionate entrance to women (harassment, assaults, etc.). Waitresses humour passionate assaults by bosses, managers or intensity tip-giving customers. Hotel maids worry about the men whose bedrooms they clean. Aspiring actresses grieve over assaults or passionate demands from producers and directors. Tech designers requesting for appropriation for their new apps fear demands for sex from those who competence fund their apps. Female lobbyists fear legislators’ demands exchanging their votes for sex. Students in need of good grades or recommendations risk assaults by their professors. Saleswomen selling mechanism systems humour passionate attack by their clients. Sexual assaults in America upsurge in poignant partial from how men and women are positioned within the deeply unsymmetrical category structures of entrepreneur enterprises and feudal households.

Gender definitions and family minister to pervasive passionate assaults as they correlate with category structures at home and at work. For example, child rearing practices that introduce gender definitions are also culprits. Basic concepts of gender rise in children by 3 to 5 years of age (Lloyd, 2010). In the US, prevalent concepts appropriate men as essentially income earners and women as essentially obliged for home and children. Even yet the decline of women now work outward of the home as good as within it, women still do the strenuous decline of caring for children inside the home and outward too in childcare centers, nursery schools, etc.

Thus, in the U.S. today, almost all children spend their first and infirm years in a virtual matriarchy. They are nurtured and also tranquil by widespread females: mothers, child caring teachers, baby nurses, and baby sitters. Male’s beginning clarity of females is of those who regulate over their helplessness, ineptitude, powerlessness, earthy and psychological dependency and intensity humiliation, as good as their survival. Boys may so rise feelings of chagrin at their needs for women to caring for them. They may also hold low rancour and fury against women’s energy over them. Later in their lives as men, passionate nuisance and attack may turn ways to overcome feelings of need, dependence, and humiliation. Assaults may duty as means to shame womanlike sexuality, thereby transforming a man’s shame at his need for women onto the women he needs. Forcible assaults may offer to retreat a man’s clarity of coherence on appreciative women and chagrin and shame at his need for women. Lastly, attack can turn a form of punish taken against women as objects of need given infancy.

Matriarchal child-rearing practices can also capacitate passionate assaults on women in other ways. Female children brand with the women who approximate them. Because boys’ models—fathers—are mostly distant reduction present, boys may brand in a disastrous way. That is, they may consider of themselves as “not females” and demonstrate this around a elimination of women and/or a rejecting of qualities compared with women in the society: i.e. nurturance, gentleness, countenance of emotion, and need for romantic tie with others. Women are allowed to need all sorts of help and support from other people, since men aspire to self-reliance, and so on.

Within the prevalent male stereotype, the one need men are allowed is for sex. American enlightenment exaggerates men’s passionate needs while repressing their other and some-more exposed needs for love and romantic caring from others. Men’s socially excusable need for sex substitutes for the restricted needs that men are disheartened from showing. However, such mutation can have dangerous consequences. On the one hand, men resent having to benefit women’s capitulation as a means to entrance their sexuality. Yet at the same time, they need that access. One way to navigate that counterbalance is by passionate assault: entrance gained but displaying need for approval.

A horrible phenomenon of men’s passionate need compared with shame at wanting women are the contribution that American prostitutes’ life outlook is 34 years and that the heading means of their deaths is carnage (Pottera, D. et al., 2004). Men may kill their prostituted women partners to solve the tensions between being passionate as virile and feeling deeply abashed by a need for sex. They may kill their shame by killing the women they hired to meet their passionate needs. That substantially relates to the fact that one of the top rates of death for women between 15 and 44 years old is carnage committed by husbands, lovers and determined boyfriends (Petrosky et al. Jul 21, 2017)

A compared aspect of the stereotypic male sex role is the hang-up of many emotions solely anger. Social acceptance of male anger as virile mostly extends to cover male fury and violence. Little boys play with fondle guns: little girls with dolls. Boys’ modes of distraction are mostly violent: games such as cowboys and Indians, cops and robbers, video games, or aroused sports like football or ice hockey. Adult males follow fit with their own aroused video games, aroused sports, and shooting. Patterns of attack in the armed forces, veteran and college sports also embody jagged amounts of sex abuse (Morris 1996, Carter, 2017).

Sexual attack has been a fact opposite U.S. history. What is new is the uncovering, the open tour of passionate assault. An critical doubt is what social changes have allowed and stirred passionate attack to be suggested and reviled?

One pivotal change concerns the mercantile conditions of existence for feudal households and the gender differentiations fake there. The decline of men earn incomes that no longer sufficient for them to be the solitary providers for their households. Global telecommunications, computers, robots, and jet transport have enabled profit-driven US capitalists to outsource production. The poorer nations of the universe are now accessible for super exploitation and super profits. It is no longer compulsory to compensate decent, no reduction family wages, to American male workers. To secure the family incomes compulsory to support the American dream, women now have to do waged work outward their homes as good as continue to perform many the labor indispensable within them. It is burdensome and increasingly frustrating for women. With their own income and income incomes and the compared freedoms, women are deserting men who direct women’s continued normal serf-like labors and their subservience inside the household.

For the first time in U.S. story the decline of women are singular and the decline of men and women in the ages of flood are unmarried. More than 4 out of 10 American children are now innate outward of a matrimony (Fraad, Jun 13, 2012). Men’s feudal domicile lordship is challenged on a simple mercantile level. Women are abandoning their former flunky positions inside households with their prolonged histories of abuse. Women increasingly live in singular adult households doing just those domestic, romantic and passionate labors they choose. Sometimes they now live in community households, pity domestic and romantic labors with sex partners or other adults and children. Whether or not women have been means to change their category positions in enterprises from employee to employer, a decline of them have deserted domicile feudal category structures as good as the consequent male authority over womanlike sexuality.

Women have turn unwavering of their changing positions inside households in several ways, using opposite concepts and terms to clear the changes to themselves and others. Central to their elaborating self-consciousness, women have increasingly announced their former subordinations to men inside their households—and generally their passionate mastery and abuse—no longer tolerable. What happened inside households is being extended now to enterprises and activities outward households as well.

Female victims of passionate attack are holding power. They reject the shame in being assaulted and change it onto their abusers by tour them. The #Metoo hashtag used by women who were sexually assaulted is clearer in France where the hashtag translates to “out your pig.” The accusers of passionate attack have found their voices and their social power. Here is a doctrine to be learned. When oppressed and exploited people come to know and get in hold with their fury against those conditions, that fury can be an agent of transformation.

Of course, other forces also contributed to women’s rebel against passionate assault. Examples embody developments in methods of birth control and declines in approved religions’ hold generally on the young. Our concentration here, quite on interactions among category structures and gender definitions, is meant not only to supplement these forces to explanations of today’s rebel against passionate assault. It is also meant to indicate toward solutions: unsentimental social changes that can revoke passionate nuisance and assault.

Transition from the hierarchical entrepreneur category structure of contemporary enterprises to an economy formed instead on worker-coops would be a constructional change contributing to an finish to passionate abuse. In cooperatively orderly enterprises, all workers, men and women equally and democratically, confirm the what, how, where and when of production. Each worker is both employee and employer: the common of employees is the employer. Where entrepreneur enterprises make decisions that strengthen the hierarchy inside them, worker coops’ decisions strengthen their very opposite category structures. The domination/subordination dichotomy that condemned labour and feudalism as good as capitalism is finally overcome. That equivalence and democracy inside worker coops enables a successful onslaught against passionate nuisance and assault. That onslaught starts with the disappearance of tiny sets of men in the employer position of determining possibly the mass of employees, women and men, will have jobs, incomes, career enrichment opportunities, etc.

A worker-coop formed economy could and likely would take serve stairs to finish the poisonous brew of unsymmetrical gender definitions and manners with hierarchical category structures in domicile and craving workplaces. For example, it could charge maternity and paternity leaves as good as a clever campaign enchanting both sex relatives in child rearing. It could show the value of nurturance by financing peculiarity early child caring and after school caring centers. It could renovate the margin of childcare from it’s stream standing as one of the lowest paid to a reputable and well-paid field. By attracting both men and women to the field, it could finish the matriarchy of early childhood in America.

Such social and mercantile changes can create better lives for all of us including and also going over interlude passionate attack in America. Whatever effects dignified and authorised oppositions to passionate nuisance and attack may have, it will take material, constructional changes to reorient social duty in durability ways. The exploitation unique to the hierarchical workplace organizations that array minorities (masters, lords and employers) against majorities (slaves, serfs, and employees) and the hardship of women thereby enabled have always been pivotal supports for passionate (as good as other forms of) nuisance and assault. The social transition to a non-hierarchical workplace organization, such as a worker–coop formed economy, as good clever inhabitant campaigns, programs and laws fostering and ancillary gender equivalence at home and at work will together mislay the pivotal social and mercantile pillars that hold entrepreneur and feudal exploitation and gendered hardship around American society.

Dr. Harriet Fraad is a protected mental health advisor and hypnotherapist in private use in New York City. She is a first member of the biography Rethinking Marxism. 

auto magazine

Check Also

How Donald Trump Plans to Enlist Fossil Fuels in the Struggle for Global Dominance

Photo Credit: Ungnoi Lookjeab/Shutterstock The new U.S. appetite policy of the Trump epoch is, in …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>