Photo Credit: YouTube Screengrab
In the past week alone, the Trump administration has announced it will finish insurance for 200,000 Salvadorans now staying in the U.S. and signaled it would concede states to make work mandate for Medicaid recipients. And that was before Donald Trump reportedly questioned because the U.S. is usurpation immigrants from “shithole countries” during a bipartisan assembly in the Oval Office (The boss has given denied using that language, nonetheless Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) insists that’s what he said.)
For the New York Times’ Paul Krugman, it’s all of a piece for a GOP that wants to harm people, privately those from bad families.
In his Friday column, he examines 3 policy positions that seem to endorse perversion has turn partial of the Republican platform. The first is the party’s refusal to enhance Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, which should have been a “no-brainer” for every state. But eight years after the legislation’s passage, 18 states have refused, “all of them with Republican-controlled legislatures, governors or both.”
“For a while you could disagree that it was about asocial domestic strategy: Medicaid enlargement was a policy of Barack Obama, and Republicans didn’t wish to give a Democratic boss any policy successes,” he writes. “But that story can’t explain states’ stability insurgency to the thought of providing health coverage to thousands of their own adults at minimal cost. No, at this indicate it’s transparent that G.O.P. politicians simply don’t wish lower-income families to have entrance to health caring and are actually peaceful to harm their own states’ economies to repudiate them that access.”
Then there’s the Republican call to levy aforementioned work mandate on Medicaid recipients, which has only grown louder given Trump insincere office. As Krugman explains, 10 of the states exploring such measures have supposed Medicaid expansions, so they don’t even mount to save income from booting people off their rolls. Ultimately, their motivations are as elementary as they are vicious.
“It’s about stigmatizing those who accept supervision aid, forcing them to burst by hoops to infer their neediness,” he notes. “Again, the pain is the point.”
Lastly, and many appallingly, there are the millions of children who mount to remove their coverage under the Children’s Health Insurance Program if Congress refuses to reauthorize CHIP’s funding. Krugman records that a 10-year prolongation would eventually save the supervision $6 billion in associated health caring costs, but few if anyone in the Republican Party seems to care.
“Republican foot-dragging on CHIP, like antithesis to Medicaid enlargement and the direct for work requirements, isn’t about the money, it’s about the cruelty,” he closes. “Making lower-income Americans worse off has turn a idea in itself for the complicated G.O.P., a idea the party is actually peaceful to spend income and boost deficits to achieve.”
Read Paul Krugman’s mainstay at the New York Times.
Jacob Sugarman is a handling editor at AlterNet.