No doubt, many Republicans are jubilant currently over the Trump administration’s proclamation of its “new” Syria policy. Unfortunately, that policy is matching to the one set by Barack Obama and his and Trump’s competition during the contemptible 2016 election, Hillary Clinton. With that in mind, it begs the doubt what Republicans were so dissapoint about when Obama was president, but that’s another subject for another article.
The oil lord Tillerson announced in a debate to the Stanford University Hoover Institute that the United States will be staying in Syria despite progressing claims that the reason the U.S. was in Syria was to see to the better of ISIS. Now, Tillerson says American forces will sojourn in Syria until 5 conditions are met:
- The better of ISIS
- Assad is private from power
- Syrian refugees return to Syria
- Iranian change is discontinued and
- Syria becomes free of weapons of mass destruction.
Tellingly, Tillerson’s statements were done during a debate and “interview” event in front of a live assembly where the interviewer was zero other than famous neo-con quarrel criminal, Condoleezza Rice. We can only assume that Rice’s heart began to nictitate at conference the difference “weapons of mass destruction” used in front of a inhabitant assembly nonetheless again used to transparent a mass slaughter.
“A sum withdrawal of American crew at this time would help [Syrian President Bashar al-] Assad,” pronounced Tillerson. “A stable, one and eccentric Syria eventually requires post-Assad care in sequence to be successful. Continued U.S. participation to safeguard the durability better of ISIS will also help pave the way for legitimate internal polite authorities to practice obliged governance of their own released areas.”
The Destruction of ISIS
ISIS correct has mostly been degraded in Syria. Only a few thousand fighters sojourn in comparatively removed locations and in areas that are strategically easy to liberate. However, it is of peerless significance to indicate out that the United States does not and never has wanted to see the better of ISIS in Syria or anywhere else. In fact, ISIS was wholly a origination of the United States from day one and the U.S. has confirmed control of the militant classification ever since. It is zero some-more than a substitute army, a new name practical to al-Qaeda, and a accessible victim for militant invasions and attacks conflicting the universe to serve the bulletin of the Western Deep State apparatus.
As Daniel McAdams writes for the Ron Paul Institute, “This condition is done all the some-more cryptic by the well-reported fact that it is the United States supervision that at every spin seems to lift ISIS chestnuts out of the fire. From handing them weapons to permitting them to shun when they are trapped in places like Raqqa, it almost seems like the US does not wish to really see the finish of ISIS.”
Assad Must Go
Despite Candidate Donald Trump uttering the famous anti-war difference that may have gotten him elected, President Trump’s administration is sounding matching to the warmongering Obama administration. Remember, it was only a year ago when Trump settled that “We will pursue a new unfamiliar policy that finally learns from the mistakes of the past. We will stop looking to disintegrate regimes and overpower governments. …In the exchange with other countries we will find shared interests wherever possible…”
Today, his administration is observant the opposite. Rex Tillerson:
The United States believes that free and pure elections … will outcome in the permanent depart of Assad and his family from power… Assad’s regime is corrupt, and his methods of governance and mercantile growth have increasingly released certain racial and eremite groups… Such hardship can't insist forever.
. . . . .
…our expectancy is that the enterprise for a return to normal life … will help convene the Syrian people and people within the regime to enforce Assad to step down.
. . . . .
“A sum withdrawal of American crew at this time would help [Syrian President Bashar al-] Assad. A stable, one and eccentric Syria eventually requires post-Assad care in sequence to be successful. Continued U.S. participation to safeguard the durability better of ISIS will also help pave the way for legitimate internal polite authorities to practice obliged governance of their own released areas.”
In other words, the Trump administration policy is the same as the Obama administration policy. This means that the United States is still dedicated to the overpower of a massively renouned democratically inaugurated boss and to the support of terrorists, jihadists, and immoderate Marxists.
As Daniel McAdams writes,
Tillerson also done the weird avowal that US troops will sojourn in Syria to forestall the Syrian supervision from re-establishing control over the tools of Syria deserted by a degraded ISIS. So the legitimate supervision of Syria will be prevented by an illegal United States military function from reclaiming its own territory? This is ostensible to be a awake policy?
The Refugee Question
This is nonetheless another disjointed aspect of the American policy towards Syria. Syrian refugees have actually been returning to Syria in droves. The determining cause for Syrians who wish to return, however, is either or not they are means to return to supervision held areas. As the Syrian supervision liberates some-more territory, some-more and some-more Syrians have returned to the country given it is in supervision held domain where they can live their lives, free of the “democracy” that sees mass beheadings, executions, rapes, and crucifixions.
The doubt of interloper return is clearly zero some-more than an forgive to sojourn in Syria, however, and it is one that can be continued for as prolonged as the U.S. wants to do so. After all, every African or Middle Eastern mercantile migrant pouring conflicting Europe was labeled a Syrian interloper and there is no sign Europe is going to send anyone back to their own countries ever.
Regardless, it should be remembered that one of the biggest instances of Syrian interloper return was when the Syrian supervision released East Aleppo from America’s terrorists. That liberation, of course, was fought tooth and spike by the United States, proof that returning refugees is only a smokescreen forgive for gripping forces there.
WMDs . . . Again
While we assume it was agreeably sentimental for Condoleezza Rice to have that comfortable hairy feeling at conference her “WMDs” used as a justification for advance and function on the inhabitant theatre again, there was another likeness to the Iraq and Syria WMDs claims coming from the State Department . . . they don’t exist.
The Truth About Vaccines – Free Online Event!
It has been demonstrated repeatedly, despite claims from the United States and Israel, that Syria has announced and broken its chemical weapons stockpile. This fact was even approved by the OPCW. Weapons of mass drop in Syria do not exist. If that’s what the U.S. is looking for, they would have to cranky the Golan limit and transport into Israel to find them.
This is maybe the only honest matter Tillerson done during his debate in terms of reasons the U.S. is going to continue staying in Syria. Iran has prolonged been a aim of the Western majestic complement and knocking off Syria was an try to not only exterminate Syria as a core of insurgency to the Western agenda, but also to break the change of Iran and the energy of Hezbollah. With the opening of Russia into the battle in Syria, Iran has managed to benefit a domestic and military foothold not only in Syria but also Iraq, an unintended effect for the invaders given it was approaching that Syria would fall in 2011-12. Therefore, there is a genuine try on the partial of the U.S. government, tied at the hip with Israel, to break Iranian change in the region. Eventually, however, the same destabilization methods used in Libya and Syria are to be destined at Iran, one try we have already witnessed in the case of the Iranian protesters that took place weeks ago.
The “new” Trump administration policy is not “new” at all. In fact, it is a policy that goes directly back to the prototype and competition Trump rightly lambasted during his own presidential campaign. Indeed, the devise even goes back to the neo-con filthy Bush administration which saw the launch of the quarrel of terror conflicting the universe that has ensured America’s bloody bequest for centuries. Trump saw that Iraq was a bad idea. He saw that remaining in Afghanistan was a bad idea. He saw that Libya was a bad idea. He saw that Syria was a bad thought and betrothed never to follow those courses again. Now, as President, Trump is “staying the course” in Afghanistan, stability the quarrel in Iraq, gripping troops in Libya, and stability the fraudulent quarrel in Syria. This is not 4D chess. It is a betrayal. It is incorrigible and it is criminal.
For those Trump supporters who remain, it is time to acknowledge that Donald Trump is not personification a shining diversion of chess but merely stability the same policies of his predecessors. This delay of quarrel is not, in any way, excusable. While there does seem to be a Deep State quarrel on this President, it’s transparent the Deep State is winning and that Trump, ardent as he may be, is not putting up a fight.
Brandon Turbeville writes for Activist Post – essay repository here – He is the author of 7 books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, Five Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2, The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria, The Difference it Makes: 36 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President, and Resisting The Empire: The Plan To Destroy Syria And How The Future Of The World Depends On The Outcome. Turbeville has published over 1000 articles on a far-reaching accumulation of subjects including health, economics, supervision corruption, and polite liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s radio show Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV. His website is BrandonTurbeville.com He is accessible for radio and TV interviews. Please hit activistpost (at) gmail.com.
This essay may be openly shared in partial or in full with author detrimental and source link.
Support us at Patreon. Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, Steemit, and BitChute. Ready for solutions? Subscribe to the reward newsletter Counter Markets.