The Justice Department currently filed a lawsuit alleging that the City of Springfield, Illinois, has discriminated against persons with disabilities in defilement of the Fair Housing Act. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois, alleges that Springfield’s zoning code treats tiny organisation homes for persons with disabilities reduction agreeably than similarly-situated housing for people but disabilities. The department’s censure serve alleges that, even if the zoning code were valid, Springfield disregarded the Fair Housing Act by unwell to extend an difference that would concede a three-person organisation home for people with disabilities to continue handling in a residential neighborhood.
“The Fair Housing Act prohibits cities from requesting their zoning laws in a demeanour that discriminates against persons with disabilities,” pronounced Acting Assistant Attorney General John Gore of the Civil Rights Division. “We will continue to energetically make the Fair Housing Act’s breach on such discrimination.”
This case arose when the City of Springfield attempted to close a home with 3 residents with egghead and earthy disabilities since the home disregarded a 600-foot spacing requirement that relates to village residences for persons with disabilities. That spacing requirement does not request to homes for up to 5 separate persons but disabilities. The tiny organisation home allowed two of the residents to pierce out of vast institutions and live in an integrated village setting.
The lawsuit seeks a justice sequence prohibiting Springfield from enforcing the spacing requirement against this home or similarly-situated homes for persons with disabilities elsewhere in the city. The lawsuit also seeks financial damages to recompense victims, as good as remuneration of a polite penalty. A associated case severe Springfield’s spacing requirement was filed by the home’s service provider and one resident. The justice in that case, A.D. ex rel. Valencia v. City of Springfield, released a rough claim against Springfield on Aug. 2, 2017. That statute is now on interest to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
The sovereign Fair Housing Act prohibits taste in housing formed on disability, race, color, religion, inhabitant origin, sex, and patrimonial status.