By Catherine J. Frompovich
Now that 2017 is circuitous down and 2018 is about to take core stage, people customarily like to rivet in charity forecasts, e.g., prognostications (predictions) and self-improvement “new year’s resolutions.” Each of us has his or her thing, which apparently preoccupies us, but there is something which really ought to squeeze the courtesy as a frightening 2018 luck that is not regarded for what it truly offers, i.e., producing disastrous health impacts, and IF we can strengthen ourselves from such unrealized earthy abuse, generally to the DNA.
Did we get your attention?
What am we articulate about?
Microwaves – Cell phones and the pull for 5G broadband, the next era in x-ray record being fast-tracked but the FCC or vested-interests producing and publicizing scold environmental impact studies and short- or long-term health impact studies on humans, pets, wildlife and all forms of vital organisms.
Microwaves correlate with water molecules in vital tissue; how does a x-ray oven prepare your food?
Why should that be of any concern? Because deleterious information per dungeon phone use and microwaves used to promote dungeon phone, iPhone and Smart Phone calls, data, photos, games, etc. indicates consumers are being harmed, generally in perspective of the National Toxicology Program’s stream study per intensity health hazards from dungeon phone radiofrequency deviation on rats, which is to be finished open in 2018.
The report, “Report of Partial Findings from the National Toxicology Program Carcinogenesis Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation in Hsd: Sprague Dawley SD Rats (Whole Body Exposure),” is accessible at http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/055699.
One of the pivotal issues per that arriving 2018 report will be how much ‘guidance’ and ‘sanitation’ influences will x-ray attention associations like ICNIRP have on the FINAL results and publication.
In the meantime, Arthur R. Firstenberg, who researches electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS/IEI) which can be caused by microwave/cell phone exposures, Wi-Fi, AMI Smart Meters, etc., has dynamic there are critical questions presumably not being asked nor investigated, which he shared with eccentric researchers and activists, and which we would like to share with my readers, having obtained Mr. Firstenberg’s permission to do so verbatim.
Arthur Robert Firstenberg is an American romantic on the theme of electromagnetic hypersensitivity. He is the founder of the eccentric campaign organisation the Cellular Phone Task Force.
Firstenberg filed several lawsuits against the Federal Communications Commission and others, only to have them adjudicated in preference of expanding x-ray record and compelling x-ray proponents’ agendas. Undoubtedly, there seems to be a set bulletin for using microwaves to exercise the notice state at all levels of life as set onward in the UN’s Agenda 21 and 2030, and the doing of the Internet of Things, which substantially will tie into the ‘ultimate’ record prize—Artificial Intelligence (AI).
So what does Arthur Firstenberg have to say?
How much deviation does a dungeon phone emit, compared to what exists in nature?
If Neil Armstrong had brought a dungeon phone to the moon in 1969, it would have seemed from earth to be the brightest intent in the star in the x-ray spectrum. In the daytime, the intent would have been brighter, but at night, the dungeon phone would have outshone every star.
There is a reason dungeon phones are outlawed in Green Bank, West Virginia: even a singular dungeon phone, even from miles away, would blind the radio astronomers there and make it unfit for them to see the stars. Astronomers magnitude radio waves in units called janskys. A standard star shines at 10 to 100 janskys. The Sun shines at about 500,000 janskys. When you hold a dungeon phone against your head, you are pumping appetite at the rate of about 100,000,000,000,000,000 janskys into your brain.1
How does that review to deviation from a dungeon tower?
Suppose there is a 2,000-watt dungeon building two blocks from your house. The prejudiced of your brain next to a dungeon phone is interesting up to one hundred thousand times as much deviation from the phone as it is from the tower.2
Are the FCC’s bearing range the same for dungeon phones and dungeon towers?
No. Cell phones are free from the range imposed on dungeon towers. The FCC measures bearing in milliwatts per retard centimeter. Depending on frequency, the FCC’s border for whole physique bearing to deviation from detached sources is about one milliwatt per retard centimeter (1 mW/cm2). The border for prejudiced physique bearing to a dungeon phone is approximately 20 mW/cm2 (for the brain), which assumes the phone is held at slightest one and a half centimeters divided from your head. It is 50 mW/cm2 (for the hands, wrists and ears). If you hold the phone flush against your head, like many people do, or firmly between your conduct and your shoulder, the bearing to the brain can proceed 50 mW/cm2 also.3
Who set the bearing limits?
A radar scientist named Herman Schwan who was brought to the United States from Germany after World War II as prejudiced of Project Paperclip. He finished some assumptions about the rate at which the human physique is means of getting absolved of heat, and on that basement he estimated that the physique could safely catch an volume of deviation equal to 100 mW/cm2. His assumptions were shortly proven wrong, given initial animals died within mins when unprotected to that much radiation. So over the years, the protected spin was reduced first to 10 mW/cm2 and after to the stream border of 1 mW/cm2.
Why is the brain free from those limits?
Because those range would make dungeon phones impractical. And given new assumptions were finished about how much feverishness the brain could safely absorb, and the rate at which the physique could waste that heat. It was motionless that the brain could be safely exhilarated by up to 1° C (1.8° F).
Have these assumptions proven correct?
No. A 1° C arise in feverishness is customarily deliberate a fever. And nonetheless the brain as a whole is exhilarated reduction than 1° C by a dungeon phone, the fullness is not uniform. DNA, for example, resonantly absorbs x-ray radiation. In experiments finished at the Food and Drug Administration during the 1980s, DNA engrossed 400 times as much deviation as expected.4 Research finished at the Max Planck Institute in Germany in 2006 found that brain synapses may be resonantly exhilarated by up to 100° C while the brain as a whole is exhilarated by only 1° C.5
I don’t get a headache from my dungeon phone. Can it be that bad?
Because brain hankie has no pain receptors, we don’t feel the injury. Even a headache doesn’t tell you what’s happening inside your head. Neurosurgen [sic] Leif Salford and his colleagues in Sweden found that a singular two-hour bearing to a dungeon phone henceforth destroys up to two percent of a rat’s brain cells.6 Superficially the rats are fine, but two percent of their brain is gone. The experiments gave identical results even when the bearing spin was reduced a hundredfold. And in experiments on the blood-brain barrier, they reduced the bearing spin 10 thousandfold and found that repairs to the blood-brain separator was worse when the bearing spin was reduced.7
That means that holding the phone divided from your conduct does not strengthen you. It means that if you use a Bluetooth headset, which emits only 2.5 milliwatts, you are doing some-more repairs to yourself than if you hold the phone to your head. The blood-brain separator keeps bacteria, virusus [sic s/b viruses], and poisonous chemicals out of your brain and maintains the brain at consistent pressure. Too much intracranial vigour can lead to a stroke.
How quick does the repairs to the blood-brain separator happen?
Leakage of the blood-brain separator is detectable within two mins of bearing and substantially starts within seconds.
What do the stroke statistics tell us?
The occurrence of stroke altogether is solid or disappearing but it is rising in adults younger than 50,8 and shockingly so in very immature adults. A Danish study published in 2016 examined the rate of strokes in people aged 15 to 30. The annual series of strokes in that age organisation in Denmark rose 50 percent between 1994 and 2012, and the annual series of transitory ischemic attacks (mini-strokes) in that age organisation tripled.9
I’m confused. Which is safer, low energy or high power?
Neither. The aloft the power, the some-more heat. The reduce the power, the some-more steam of the blood-brain barrier. The aloft the power, the some-more your metabolism is disturbed.10 The reduce the power, the some-more calcium leaks out of your cells.11 Microwave deviation injures the physique in many opposite ways. It depends on which outcome you are looking at.
What about the nearby margin plume? Isn’t a dungeon phone safer when it is held some-more than 6 inches divided from your head?
There is no such thing as a nearby margin “plume.” The nearby margin is simply the segment nearby a source of deviation where the electric margin is detached from the captivating margin and the strength of presumably can't be accurately predicted. There is no pointy range between nearby margin and distant margin and the elemental properties of the deviation do not change.
What about those helmet products that you hang on one side of your phone to retard the deviation in the instruction of your brain?
The people who designed those products forgot that your arm, being an electrical conductor, is also an antenna. When you hold a dungeon phone in your hand, your whole arm, and not just the dungeon phone, becomes a radio conductor that sends and receives the dungeon phone vigilance and conducts it into the rest of your body. Putting contemplative element on one side of the phone doesn’t do very much. To the border that it does anything, it creates the phone work harder and actually increases the volume of deviation instead of dwindling it. The designers of those products forgot to test them on phones that someone was actually holding. [CJF emphasis]
Is a dungeon phone protected if we use a connected headset?
In 2000, contrast by Consumers’ Association in the UK showed that using a connected headset actually tripled the deviation to the brain. Instead of safeguarding the user, the hoop conducts the deviation from the dungeon phone directly into the user’s ear and brain.12 In addition, phones work at larger energy and evacuate some-more deviation when held next the spin of the head. And if you work one while it is in your pocket, it is irradiating your hip, colon, and reproductive viscera while the headset is irradiating your brain.
Is it protected to keep a dungeon phone in my pocket when I’m not using it?
That’s what many people do. And sum hip replacements have skyrocketed. Between 2000 and 2010 the series of annual hip replacements in the U.S. some-more than doubled, and the rate of hip replacements among people aged 45-54 some-more than tripled.13
Rates of colon cancer among Americans aged 20-54, which had been disappearing for decades, began to arise in 1997 when widespread dungeon phone use began. The arise has been steepest and began beginning (1995) in people aged 20-29: the rate of colon cancer in immature men and women aged 20-29 doubled between 1995 and 2013.14
Rates of prostate cancer have been rising worldwide given 1997.15 The series of cases of prostate cancer among Swedish men aged 50-59 was fast for decades until 1996 and rose ninefold between 1997 and 2004.16 The occurrence of metastatic prostate cancer among American men under 55 increasing 62% between 2004 and 2013, and scarcely doubled for men aged 55-69 during the same period.17
Several studies have found that men who keep their dungeon phones on standby in their pocket or on their belt reduce their spermatazoa count by up to 30 percent.18 A study conducted from 2003 to 2013 found that immature men now had reduce spermatazoa depends than their elders, and that people innate between 1990 and 1995 had on normal 40 percent reduce spermatazoa depends than men innate earlier.19 Almost every study that has been conducted has found a approach attribute between dungeon phone use and spermatazoa count, motility, and/or morphology.20
Is it protected for women to keep a dungeon phone in their bra?
Women in their twenties and thirties who keep their dungeon phones in their bras are getting a particular form of breast cancer directly underneath where they keep their phones.21
How distant does the deviation from my dungeon phone travel?
The vigilance goes out forever. It does not just transport to the nearest dungeon tower, and it does not transport in only that direction. It goes on forever, in all directions, as prolonged as there are no hills or objects in the way. It pollutes your whole area and it travels upward to the intent and stars. It just keeps on going. [CJF emphasis]
Those few people who owned an analog dungeon phone back in 1996 may remember how distant detached dungeon towers used to be. As prolonged as there were no hills in the way, you used to be means to get a vigilance from 90 miles away. The only reason dungeon towers have to be so close together currently is given a singular building can only offer a singular series of people. The some-more users, the some-more towers have to be built. Also the some-more bandwidth, the some-more towers have to be built: using dungeon phones as computers and not just phones means there have to be a lot some-more towers. That, and the fact that digital signals are some-more theme to division than analog signals. But the deviation still goes on forever.
Isn’t it my choice? The deviation is out there anyway, so given shouldn’t we use it? we need my dungeon phone.
There are so many dungeon towers everywhere currently that it is easy to assume you are not making anything worse when you make a dungeon phone call—that all you are doing is drumming into what’s already out there, like putting one some-more vehicle onto an widespread highway that has already been built.
That is an illusion. When everyone’s phone is incited off, the dungeon towers are handling at minimal energy on one setup channel that has to promote at all times in case someone wants to make a call. Things are a little some-more formidable currently given some-more frequencies are in use but that is the simple situation.
What happens when you spin on your phone and make a call is that the nearest dungeon building has to spin on a voice channel just for you, which also broadcasts in every instruction and also pollutes the whole area and goes on perpetually out into the universe. If you have a smart phone and use the Internet the dungeon building also opens up a information channel just for you. And in sequence for you to strech the person you are calling, the dungeon building nearest to him or her also has to open up a channel just for that person and send deviation in all directions and that person has to answer their phone and send some-more deviation in all directions. And on weekdays during the dusk commute, and all day Saturday and Sunday, when everybody in the universe is on their phone, every dungeon building has hundreds of channels handling on hundreds of frequencies and emits much some-more deviation than late at night when everybody is off their phone. When your phone is off, mixed dungeon towers are quieter. When you are using your phone, you are polluting your own and at slightest one other person’s neighborhood.
I only keep my phone for emergencies when we travel. That has minimal impact, right?
The other thing that happens when you make a call is you are demanding service. When you spin on your phone in a remote plcae where dungeon phone service is bad or non-existent, your provider registers that as a ask for service. If it gets adequate requests for service in that location, it will build a dungeon building there. Even in a city, when some-more people make calls at the same time than there is ability for in the nearest tower, or when everybody starts using some-more bandwidth or gets some-more apps than the building can handle, calls start to be dropped, any forsaken call is purebred as a ask for service, and shortly your city has applications for even some-more dungeon towers to hoop the increasing traffic.
I got sick from a smart phone. My flip phone is much safer, right?
Smart phones didn’t come among us until 2004. But the first call of digital, voice-only dungeon towers in the United States in 1996 killed at slightest 10 thousand people in a matter of months,22 and millions some-more from diabetes, heart disease, and cancer in the next years.23
How did the Cellular Phone Task Force get its name?
Pelda Levey and we [ARF] named the classification the Cellular Phone Task Force in 1996 with several functions in mind, inaugural among them being that the hazard to the universe that we were confronting was and is the dungeon phone. WiFi came among us in 2001, smart phones in 2004, smart meters in 2007, 5G in 2017, any building on a substructure that has turn so big and so ubiquitous that many people, even many of the injured, take it for granted. Like the self-evident blind men touching the opposite extremities of the elephant, we have turn preoccupied of the savage itself. The problem with smart phones isn’t that they are smart, but that they are phones. Even smart meters are only an arm of the wireless torso, the executive quadruped to which it is trustworthy and to which the civilization and enlightenment have turn so dependent, in the brief camber of two decades, that we can no longer suppose that it is not only probable but required to live but it. Only then will we stop 5G. Only then will we keep the landlines. Only then will we save the planet. [CJF emphasis]
1 1 jansky = 10-26 mW/m2/Hz. The values given are for dungeon phone frequencies.
2 Exposure decreases with the retard of the distance.
3 Cell phones are regulated by their Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), which is given in watts per kilogram (W/kg). The SAR border for dungeon phones in the U.S. is 1.6 W/kg for the brain and 4 W/kg for the hands, wrists and ears. The far-field equivalents are 20 mW/cm2 for the brain and 50 mW/cm2 for the hands, wrists and ears.
4 Mays Swicord, Chain-Length Dependent Microwave Absorption of DNA, Biopolymers 22: 2513-2516 (1983).
5 C. Holtze et al., The Microwave Absorption of Emulsions Containing Aqueous Micro- and Nanodroplets: A Means to Optimize Microwave Heating, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 302: 651-657 (2006); Max Rauner, “Hot Conversations,” Die Zeit, Aug. 21, 2006 (in German).
6 L. G. Salford et al., Nerve Cell Damage in Mammalian Brain after Exposure to Microwaves from GSM Mobile Phones, Environmental Health Perspectives 111(7): 881-883 (2003).
7 B. R. R. Persson et al., Blood-brain Barrier Permeability in Rats Exposed to Electromagnetic Fields Used in Wireless Communications, Wireless Networks 3: 455-461 (1997).
8 Y. Bejot et al., Trends in the Incidence of Ischaemic Stroke in Young Adults Between 1985 and 2011: the Dijon Stroke Registry, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 85: 509-513 (2014); J. Putaala et al., Analysis of 1008 uninterrupted Patients Aged 15 5o 49 with First-Ever Ischemic Stroke: the Helsinki Young Stroke Registry, Stroke 40: 1195-1203 (2009); A Rosengren et al., Twenty-four-year Trends in the Incidence of Ischemic Stroke in Sweden from 1987 to 2010, Stroke 44: 2388-2393 (2013).
9 M. Tibæk et al., Increasing Incidence of Hospitalization for Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack in Young Adults: A Registry-Based Study, Journal of the American Heart Association 5: e003158 (2016).
10 A. Firstenberg, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life (AGB Press, 2017), chapters 10-14; A. Sanders et al., The Differential Effects of 200, 591, and 2,450 MHz Radiation on Rat Brain Energy Metabolism,” Bioelectromagnetics 5: 419-33 (1984); M. Blank and R. Goodman, Electromagnetic Fields Stress Living Cells, Pathophysiology 16(2-3): 71-78 (2009).
11 Calcium exhalation from brain cells occurs at specific energy “windows.” Reducing the energy 3000-fold can quadruple the effect. S. Dutta et al., Microwave Radiation-Induced Calcium Ion Flux from Human Neuroblastoma Cells: Dependence on Depth of Amplitude Modulation and Exposure Time. In Biological Effects of Electropollution, S. Dutta and R. Millis, eds. (Information Ventures, 1986), pp. 63-69.
12 “Special Report: The Ring of Truth.” Which? Magazine, Apr 11-17, 2000.
13 M. L. Wolford et al., Hospitalization for Total Hip Replacement Among Inpatients Aged 45 and Over: United States, 2000-2010, NCHS Data Brief No. 186, Februrary 2015.
14 R. L. Siegel et al., Colorectal Cancer Incidence Patterns in the United States, 1974-2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute 109(8): djw322 (2017).
15 M. C. S. Wong et al., Global Incidence and Mortality for Prostate Cancer: Analysis of Temporal Patterns and Trends in 36 countries, European Urology 70: 862-874 (2016).
16 Ö. Hallberg and O. Johansson, Apparent Decreases in Swedish Public Health Indicators after 1997 – Are They Due to Improved Diagnostics or to Environmental Factors? Pathophysiology 16(1): 43-46 (2009).
17 A. B. Weiner et al., Increasing Incidence of Metastatic Prostate Cancer in the United States (2004-2013), Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases 19: 395-397 (2016).
18 I. Fejes et al., Relationship between Regular Cell Phone Use and Human Semen Quality, Abstracts of the 20th Annual Meeting of the ESHRE, Berlin, Germany, 27-30 Jun 2004, p. i57; A. Zilberlicht et cl., Habits of Cell Phone Usage and Sperm Quality – Does It Warrant Attention?, Reproductive BioMedicine Online 31: 421-426 (2015).
19 G. M. Centola et al., Decline in Sperm Count and Motility in Young Adult Men from 2003 to 2013: Observations from a U.S. Sperm Bank, Andrology 4: 270-276 (2016).
20 La Vignera et al., Effects of the Exposure to Mobile Phones on Male Reproduction: A Review of the Literature, Journal of Andrology, 33(3): 350-56 (2012); J. A. Adams et al., Effect of Mobile Telephones on Sperm Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, Environment International 70: 106-12 (2014); K. Liu et al., Association between Mobile Phone Use and Semen Quality: a Systemic Review and Meta-analysis, Andrology 2: 491-501 (2016); B. J. Houston et al., The Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation on Sperm Function, Reproduction 152: R263-R276 (2016);
21 J. G. West et al., Multifocal Breast Cancer in Young Wemen with Prolonged Contact between Their Breasts and Their Cellular Phones, Case Reports in Medicine, essay ID 354682 (2013).
22 A. Firstenberg, “PCS Kills Ten Thousand,” No Place To Hide 1(4): 6-7 (1998); A. Firstenberg, “Mortality Statistics (continued),” No Place To Hide 2(2): 11-14 (1999).
23 A. Firstenberg, The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life (AGB Press, 2017), chapters 11-13. The Invisible Rainbow is accessible for squeeze at www.cellphonetaskforce.org
Cell phone use has turn zero brief of an addiction, which is grossly inspiring and formulating the direct for some-more x-ray towers to be built.
However, to get around the terribly costly costs of adding some-more infrastructure and having to build additional dungeon towers costing between $100,000 to $150,000 each, the x-ray attention wants to exercise 5G by attaching what’s called “thimble” tiny dungeon towers on application poles or presumably on your front porch or outward your bedroom window but your capitulation or your being means to intent or have them removed!
This is what happens when consumers turn burned into desiring a vested industry’s promotion about reserve and practical advantages for consumers.
Fried smarts for everyone?
Signs and Symptoms of Cell Phone Addiction
Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired healthy nutritionist who warranted modernized degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice and Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in inhabitant and airline magazines given the early 1980s. Catherine authored countless books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic medical professionals. She has been a consumer medical researcher 35 years and counting.
Catherine’s latest book, published Oct 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, accessible on Amazon.com.
Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective Non-Toxic Treatments, is accessible on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.
Two of Catherine’s some-more new books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can we Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)
Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available