Home / News / A Closer Look at Christmas

A Closer Look at Christmas

At this time of year, every year, we hear the Christmas story again. The informed elements—the full inn, the stable, the manger, the animals (not mentioned in the Gospels, by the way), swaddling clothes, angels and shepherds—all yield comfort by their very familiarity. They bond us to tradition and to good art and music, providing an anchor for the rituals and rhythms at the finish of the year.

We also hear unchanging discussions about the “true definition of Christmas.” This is frequently compared with assent on earth and good will toward men, generosity, and associated ideas—but frequency about the Incarnation. Perhaps the story has turn so informed that we no longer possess the consternation we should have about the Christmas eventuality so prolonged ago.

So let’s demeanour again at some informed elements of the story in light of new scholarship. we design this will give us a fresh perspective of the nativity.

No Room at the Inn

In the normal translation, Jesus is laid in a manger since there is no room for them in the motel (Luke 2:7).  In some retellings, the innkeeper has care on the wayfarers and sends them to his stable; in others, he sees an event for some-more cash; in still others, Joseph and Mary preserve to a cavern as a last resort.


All of which is substantially wrong.

The Greek word katalyma can meant inn, but that is not how it is used in the New Testament. In Luke 22:11 and Mark 14:14, it is translated as “guest room,” referring to the top room where Jesus distinguished the Last Supper. When Luke wants to appropriate an motel with an innkeeper, he uses an wholly opposite word (pandocheion).

The thought that Mary and Joseph were incited divided from an motel is not upheld by the text.

So what did happen?

To know the text, we need to know something about how houses were assembled in the Middle East during this period. Houses typically had only one story. The family would stay on the belligerent floor. If the family were bad and had only a few animals, the group would be penned in at night in a territory of the categorical building with the family.

The roof, meanwhile, could be used for work space, storage, sleeping on comfortable nights, and so on. Sometimes a guest room would be built there, presumably as a permanent partial of the residence or as a proxy shelter, like those used in the Feast of Booths. Some scholars trust that the room on the roof could also have been used as a spousal cover for newlyweds, in which case it would have been the judicious place for Joseph and Mary.

Joseph, who was from King David’s line, substantially had designed to stay with kin in Bethlehem, or at slightest had done before arrangements. He and Mary substantially approaching to stay in the guest room/bridal chamber. But when they arrived, they found it occupied. What happened? Perhaps it was bad planning, or an unexpected matrimony in Bethlehem, or the social tarnish trustworthy to Mary’s pregnancy.

You would design that Mary going into labor would have done their sheltering in the guest room a priority, but no–which suggests that Mary’s pregnancy was seen as scandalous. Maybe they stayed on the categorical building with the family and animals, but in light of the liaison and successive events, it seems some-more likely that tradition is scold and they were sent to a circuitously cave.

While Shepherds Watched their Flocks by Night

To know because Joseph and Mary would be sent there, we need to know something about sheep and shepherds in the area.

Bethlehem was just a few miles from Jerusalem. Most of its sheep were unfailing for sacrifice, generally as Passover lambs. The flocks mostly stayed out in the fields; they were not brought into the caves at night. Rather, the shepherds, who were mostly Levites or even from ecclesiastic families, brought the ewes into the caves to give birth. The caves so had to be kept ritually clean. So they were not an doubtful place to send Mary in her condition.

Wrapped in Swaddling Clothes

Luke in the King James tells us that Jesus was “wrapped in swaddling clothes” (literally, “was bandaged”).

After Jewish babies were born, they were cleared in salt water and burnished with salt, then wrapped up tight, with their arms against their sides and their legs extended, looking rather like mummies. This diagnosis was believed to be good for the baby, but it was also an act with devout significance.

In Ezekiel 16:3-4, God is berating Israel for its apostasy. He says that Israel was not washed, burnished with salt, or swaddled. Because of this, following the protocol of washing, salting, and swaddling was seen as a sign of faithfulness, while unwell to do so was seen as a symbol of apostasy.

Where did the bandages for swaddling come from? There are two possibilities.

When a Jew died, the Law pronounced that he was to be buried immediately. When roving prolonged distances with all the concomitant dangers, true Jews in Jesus’ day would hang bandages around their waists for use as a funeral hide should they die or be killed along the way. Joseph may so have used cloth prepared as a funeral hide to swaddle Jesus.

The other probability has to do with the lambs that were innate in the cave. In sequence to be fit for sacrifice, the lambs had to be but mark or blemish. As a result, according to the Mishnah, baby lambs were legalised and, if but blemish, were then swaddled to keep them from injuring themselves as they thrashed around. Thus, the bandages for swaddling could have been in the cavern when Mary and Joseph arrived.

In presumably case, the swaddling garments carried with them a absolute message: Jesus was to be true to the Covenant, and he came to die, the Passover lamb of God who came to take divided the impiety of the world.

Thus the angel told the shepherds that the baby wrapped in swaddling garments and fibbing in a manger was a sign for them. As Levitical shepherds, this was a sign they could not presumably have misunderstood.

And so the shepherds went to the apparent place to find the surprising steer of a swaddled baby in a manger: the birthing caves. They found the family, revelation them and anyone who would listen about the angels and the baby. Mary kept these things in her heart, and decades later, associated them to Luke.


Hidden in the sum of the Christmas story are surpassing theological insights into Jesus and His work. Beyond it is the much exquisite and deeper stress of the Incarnation itself—God apropos human, holding on a human inlet that He will have in Himself for all eternity. This is a consternation over words.

In the midst of all of the busyness during this season, may we take time to contemplate these insights in sequence to conclude some-more deeply the exquisite Christmas story.


Glenn Sunshine is a highbrow of early complicated European story specializing in the Reformation at Central Connecticut State University and a comparison associate of the Colson Center for Christian Worldview.

auto magazine

Check Also

Trump Expresses Open Confusion, Visibly Fidgets Through Meeting on School Shooting Prevention

Photo Credit: Fox Business Network President Donald Trump on Thursday seemed to get totally lost …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>